Social Security has existed for 90 years. Why it may be more threatened than ever

• 
• 
• 
• 
• 

WASHINGTON -- When President Franklin D. Roosevelt signed the Social Security Act into law 90 years ago this week, he said it would provide economic stability to older people while giving the U.S. "an economic structure of vastly greater soundness."

Today, the program provides benefits to almost 69 million Americans each month. It's a major source of income for people older than 65 and is popular across the country and political lines.

It also looks more threatened than ever.

Social Security faces a looming shortfall in money to pay full benefits. At an Oval Office event Thursday commemorating the program's anniversary, President Donald Trump claimed "we're strengthening it." However, the president and Republicans who control Congress have not proposed a long-term solution to shore up the program.

Man infected with brain-eating amoeba after waterskiing in Lake of the Ozarks St. Mary's high school completes break from archdiocese with $1.5M campus purchase St. Louis sheriff spent office cash on patches, photos and a defense attorney McClellan: Fearing deportation, former IRA soldier leaves St. Charles for Derry St. Charles High School teacher charged with possessing child porn, placed on leave Green Street eyes new $600 million project near its shuttered Armory venue Hochman: Cardinals' Jordan Walker, now '100% bought in,' is saving his career St. Louis city employee warned against ex-comptroller going back on payroll, emails show Hoff: I watched Mizzou football's closed Saturday scrimmage. Here's what I learned Worthy: Sorry Cardinals fans, but Triple-A is where JJ Wetherholt needs to stay for now 3 months after tornado, St. Louis residents face a harsh reality. 'Not going to be rebuilt.' Prolific restaurateur Dave Bailey sued for loan on shuttered St. Louis pizza joint Goold's chat: How do Cardinals save 'Baseball Heaven,' lure fans, thrills back to Busch? Utility bills have spiked in the St. Louis area. More rate hikes are on the way. How the US government turned a Big River park in Missouri into a 'death wish'

Since Trump took office in January, the program faced more tumult. Agency staffing was slashed. Unions and advocacy groups concerned about sharing sensitive information sued. Administration officials, including the president, falsely claimed millions of dead people received Social Security benefits. Former top adviser Elon Musk said the program was a potential "Ponzi scheme."

Social Security remains far from the sound economic system that Roosevelt envisioned, due to changes made -- and not made -- under both Democratic and Republican presidents.

Here's a look at past and current challenges to Social Security, the proposed solutions and what it could take to shore up the program.

Go-broke date moved up

The so-called go-broke date -- or the date at which Social Security will no longer have enough funds to pay full benefits -- was moved up to 2034, instead of last year's estimate of 2035. After that point, Social Security would be able to pay only 81% of benefits, according to an annual report released in June.

New legislation affecting Social Security benefits contributed to earlier projected depletion dates, the report concluded.

The Social Security Fairness Act, signed into law by Democratic President Joe Biden and enacted in January, had an effect. It repealed the Windfall Elimination and Government Pension Offset provisions, increasing Social Security benefit levels for former public workers.

The new tax law Trump signed in July will accelerate the insolvency of Social Security, said Brendan Duke at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. "They haven't laid out an idea to fix it yet," he said.

Trump again claimed Thursday that his new tax and spending law will eliminate taxes on federal Social Security benefits.

That law has a temporary tax deduction for people 65 and over that applies to all income, not just Social Security. But not all Social Security beneficiaries can claim it; among those who cannot are low-income older adults who do not pay taxes on Social Security.

AARP CEO Myechia Minter-Jordan said the number of beneficiaries is set to increase to 82 million people by the time Social Security turns 100.

"As we look ahead to the next 90 years of Social Security, it's critical that it remains strong for generations to come," she said in a statement.

Privatization conversation revived

The notion of privatizing Social Security resurfaced recently when Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent this month said new tax-deferred investment accounts dubbed "Trump accounts" may serve as a "backdoor to privatization," though Treasury walked back those comments.

The public has been widely against the idea of privatizing Social Security since Republican President George W. Bush embarked on a campaign to pitch privatization of the program in 2005 through voluntary personal retirement accounts. The plan was not well-received by the public.

Glenn Hubbard, a Columbia University professor and top economist in Bush's White House, said Social Security needs to be reduced in size in order to maintain benefits for generations to come. He supports limiting benefits for wealthy retirees.

"We will have to make a choice," Hubbard said. "If you want Social Security benefits to look like they are today, we're going to have to raise everyone's taxes a lot. And if that's what people want, that's a menu, and you pay the high price and you move on."

Another option would be to increase minimum benefits and slow down benefit growth for everyone else, which Hubbard said would right the ship without requiring big tax increases, if it's done over time.

"It's really a political choice," he said, adding "Neither one of those is pain free."

Nancy Altman, president of Social Security Works, an advocacy group for the preservation of Social Security benefits, is more worried that the administration of benefits could be privatized under Trump, rather than a move toward privatized accounts. The agency cut more than 7,000 from its workforce this year as part of the Department of Government Efficiency's effort to reduce the size of the government.

A Social Security Administration representative didn't respond to a request for comment.

Concerns persist

An Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research poll conducted in April found that an increasing share of older Americans -- particularly Democrats -- support the program but aren't confident the benefit will be available to them when they retire.

"So much of what we hear is that its running out of money," said Becky Boober, 70, from Rockport, Maine, who recently retired after decades in public service. She relies on Social Security to keep her finances afloat, is grateful for the program and thinks it should be expanded.

"In my mind there are several easy fixes that are not a political stretch," she said. They include raising the income tax cap on high-income earners and possibly raising the retirement age, which is 67 for people born after 1960, though she is less inclined to support that change.

Rachel Greszler is a senior research fellow at the Heritage Foundation, the group behind the Project 2025 blueprint for Trump's second term. It called for an increase in the retirement age.

Greszler says Social Security no longer serves its intended purpose of being a social safety net for low-income older adults and is far too large. She supports pursuing privatization, which includes allowing retirees to put their Social Security taxes into a personal investment account.

She also argues for shrinking the program to a point where every retiree would receive the same Social Security benefit so long as they worked the same number of years, which she argues would increase benefits for the bottom one-third of earners. How this would affect middle-class earners is unclear.

0 Comments